It's just returning with a login error, so I'm not sure what to do >>

There is two filters how you can view submissions in inbox. Filters with small and big images. Filter with small images has such functions like promote, like, delete, so everything is fine. But with big images, there is only one option - like. Why were other options removed, whats a point? Please return those options to the big images filter! It won't heart to have same options on both filters, like it was before. Maybe it's a bug, I don't know.

Every time i come to the site, i see the same art being shown in the "most popular' section. i would like to suggest that art be "featured" as oppose to being "Most popular" this will give smaller accounts more of a chance to have there work acknowledged. It could be based on likes per week versus total likes.

I've encountered this recently when I was watching on some SL multimedia "stuff" :D

HERE the broken: https://beta.furrynetwork.com/multimedia/5464/trainer-vs-rocket/

It says "No video with supported format and MIME type found" and download gives some XML error (connection error, corrupted file and etc...)

HERE the "music player" after download plays both the sound and the video (as a normal mp4): https://beta.furrynetwork.com/vargrvanguard/multimedia/collections/24091/?viewId=3374&viewType=multimedia

Seems like a recent and new bug

I submitted a ticket regarding misleading tags and the moderator came up with an excuse to not take action, if this was FA, posts with misleading tags would get taken down ASAP, and when searching the exact same tags on FA, not a single post is misleading, somebody better teach these mods a lesson or FA will run Furry Network out of business

After doing some comparisons I've found the furaffinity importer compresses the original image. When uploaded manually this does not appear to be the case. While the submission view looks just as bad, especially with the example because of the gradients, but that's a different issue.

The images sourced from the download link

Furaffinity(original): 

Imported:

Uploaded myself:

Hello, 

I was posting one of my stories, today, and I wanted to use the headings markdowns for my title, but noticed that no matter if I was doing "#' , "##" or "###" in front of my title, the same style would come out, the Heading 1 style. 

What I wrote :

The result :

What is shown in the markdowns syntax list, at the bottom of the submission content:

I am using Google Chrome, on Windows 7. In case that helps

As FurryNetwork seeks feedback for different approaches for social media integration, I would recommend implementing ActivityPub support. ActivityPub is a recent standard by a working group of the W3C, as a federated social networking protocol, as a simpler, cleaner successor to OStatus. It would allow the ability to federate with emerging networks such as Mastodon, and anyone else that chooses to adopt it.

It can be implemented in a simple broadcast-only fashion, if desired, such as for having a means of artists being able to publish to any subscribers of any newly posted content. Or go even further, with allowing fully federated commenting (of course, anti-spam concepts can be implemented, such as with having server whitelists/blacklists, moderation queue, etc).

Secondarily, it would also provide a standardized protocol for accessing updates on FurryNetwork from third-party mobile clients, in the same style of a Twitter client.

ActivityPub is a fairly minimal JSON API, which has both a client-to-server protocol (for having a mobile/desktop client) and server-to-server protocol (for federation), using a basic metaphor of an inbox and outbox. There's also considerations for efficiently delivering updates, such as sending a message once to a remote server, for all subscribers on that other server, versus individually sending the same message to each subscriber on the same remote server individually, and so on. It's also a fairly extensible protocol, as it follows JSON-LD syntax, thus you can add any vendor-specific extensions, if needed.

To find more information on the spec, you can find it at: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/

If there's any questions about specifics with the protocol, feel free to discuss directly. The working group that's in charge of developing the standard is also fairly contactable via IRC/WebChat as well (especially for feedback on the standard).

It would be cool to enlarge and zoom in certain sections.

I have noticed that there is not currently an efficient, straightforward method for one to delete their own posts. "Request Takedown" is for copyright infringements and reporting your own post could possibly work, but it is highly inefficient. If there is not already, could an option to delete one's own posts be added?